{"id":1170,"date":"2023-03-30T13:15:00","date_gmt":"2023-03-30T13:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/?p=1170"},"modified":"2024-03-19T13:16:06","modified_gmt":"2024-03-19T13:16:06","slug":"the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/","title":{"rendered":"The exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Recently, the exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator has been the subject of heated litigation, providing an opportunity for the courts to reaffirm its status as a non-receivable. This “formidable means, commonly invoked in practice,” renders “requests made by a creditor inadmissible due to their lack of standing to act,” as Aur\u00e9lien Gazel reminds us in the Journal Sp\u00e9cial des Soci\u00e9t\u00e9s (JSS).
The complete article can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Recently, the exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator has been the subject of heated litigation, providing an opportunity for the courts to reaffirm its status as a non-receivable. This “formidable means, commonly invoked in practice,” renders “requests made by a creditor inadmissible due to their lack of standing to act,” as Aur\u00e9lien Gazel reminds […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[66],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-en"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law. - Swift<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law. - Swift\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Recently, the exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator has been the subject of heated litigation, providing an opportunity for the courts to reaffirm its status as a non-receivable. This “formidable means, commonly invoked in practice,” renders “requests made by a creditor inadmissible due to their lack of standing to act,” as Aur\u00e9lien Gazel reminds […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Swift\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-03-30T13:15:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-03-19T13:16:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Administration\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Administration\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Administration\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8f0fc39cb041451913464b4a25687bd7\"},\"headline\":\"The exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law.\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-30T13:15:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-19T13:16:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/\"},\"wordCount\":89,\"articleSection\":[\"Publications\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/\",\"name\":\"The exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law. - Swift\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-30T13:15:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-03-19T13:16:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8f0fc39cb041451913464b4a25687bd7\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/\",\"name\":\"Swift\",\"description\":\"WELCOME\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8f0fc39cb041451913464b4a25687bd7\",\"name\":\"Administration\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/335d85880c719894ba30b16df0eae6b00988dd4be6ecbd92b4fb646b51026eb0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/335d85880c719894ba30b16df0eae6b00988dd4be6ecbd92b4fb646b51026eb0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Administration\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law. - Swift","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law. - Swift","og_description":"Recently, the exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator has been the subject of heated litigation, providing an opportunity for the courts to reaffirm its status as a non-receivable. This “formidable means, commonly invoked in practice,” renders “requests made by a creditor inadmissible due to their lack of standing to act,” as Aur\u00e9lien Gazel reminds […]","og_url":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/","og_site_name":"Swift","article_published_time":"2023-03-30T13:15:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-03-19T13:16:06+00:00","author":"Administration","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Administration","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/"},"author":{"name":"Administration","@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8f0fc39cb041451913464b4a25687bd7"},"headline":"The exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law.","datePublished":"2023-03-30T13:15:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-19T13:16:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/"},"wordCount":89,"articleSection":["Publications"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/","url":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/","name":"The exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law. - Swift","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-03-30T13:15:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-03-19T13:16:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8f0fc39cb041451913464b4a25687bd7"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/the-exclusive-action-monopoly-of-the-judicial-liquidator-a-specific-non-receivable-in-collective-proceedings-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The exclusive action monopoly of the judicial liquidator: a specific non-receivable in collective proceedings law."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/","name":"Swift","description":"WELCOME","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8f0fc39cb041451913464b4a25687bd7","name":"Administration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/335d85880c719894ba30b16df0eae6b00988dd4be6ecbd92b4fb646b51026eb0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/335d85880c719894ba30b16df0eae6b00988dd4be6ecbd92b4fb646b51026eb0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Administration"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1170"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1170\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1171,"href":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1170\/revisions\/1171"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swiftlitigation.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}